LABOR DAY SALE - ENDS TODAY!

All orders $50 and over get Free Ground Shipping!

2027 DPS Pisteworks 89

ski test sidebar

The 2027 DPS Pisteworks 89 is the mid-width model in the Pisteworks line, and is arguably the most versatile. We thoroughly enjoyed our time on the new 89 this past year, and kept giving it more and more tests and tasks to see what it could do. Spoiler alert: it handled everything really well. And it should for the price. It’s tough to avoid the cost talk when dealing with the Pisteworks 89, but the interesting part is that it’s able to do so much at such a light weight.

Length171 · 178 · 184cm
Side cut
125/89/113 mm
at 178 cm length
Turn radius
16 m
at 178 cm length
Recommended terrain
Groomers, All-Mountain, Moguls
Ability level
Advanced, Expert
Rocker profile
Rocker/Camber
Construction
Poplar/Red Oak Wood Core, Carbon, World Cup Race Base

Built with a dual layer wood core, the Pisteworks 89 uses an upper layer of poplar and a lower layer of red oak. These layers are sandwiched between two full carbon laminates. We also get a carbon power plate underfoot, and that triple laminate of carbon equates to fantastic edge grip. Normally we’d think of carbon and think “stiff”, but these are different. The thinness of the wood core keeps them flexible enough to be manageable and approachable. We get a lighter feel here as the ski sits on the scale at just under 1700 g/ski in the 178. Tester John Stobierski says: “This is a great ski. Please may see my review for the pest Works 94 and everything I said about the 94 applies to the 89 there’s one significant difference between the two skis in that the size under foot 5 cm. It does make a difference the 89 is quicker and more playful without being Slopey. I like the stability of the 94 better than the 89 but it is simply a matter of preference. The Ark of the turn is a bit smaller, but still unbelievable. I would think the added width of the 94 would help in deeper snow, but I didn’t have the opportunity to try them. You can’t go wrong with either width. This is a wonderful ski. If you want to stick to the front side, you can’t go wrong. DPS has outdid itself.”

The Rocker / Camber / Rocker profile of the 2027 DPS Pisteworks 89

At 89 underfoot, DPS plays a good trick here by making you think it’s “under 90 mm”, which it is, but not by much. Does that then put it into the wide frontside category because of how well it carves? Not so fast! This ski is highly versatile and we found that it is a fantastic option for bumps, trees, and softer snow. The 178 produces a 16-meter turn radius and due to the flexible nature and rocker profile, it’s right there. DPS notes a 73% effective edge and a 27% rocker breakdown with some mild taper to make it easier to ski. We had great feedback from Steve Buccini who notes that “These skis are game to bang out big GS turns while being light enough to dance on the shoulder sugar after lunch. This ski could handle anything on piste that I could find. I suspect it would be good in the trees or few inches of fresh snow. A significant percentage (90% if I recall correctly) of the materials in the ski are sourced from within 100 miles of DPS’s Utah manufacturing facility. If you want to support local American manufacturers without compromising on performance, you can’t do much better than this ski.”

This is a wonderful ski. If you want to stick to the frontside, you can’t go wrong. DPS has outdone themselves.
John Stobierski

There’s a lot that goes into a ski like this, and it makes sense that they’re pricey, although we’re still amazed at how well they perform. The cost does take some casual skiers out of the conversation, but if you’re looking for smooth, light, powerful, and versatile, it’s tough to do better than the Pisteworks 89.

Tester Reviews
7 testers reviewed the 2027 DPS Pisteworks 89
tester:
Ability
Expert
Height
511'0"
Weight
200
Days / Year
30-50
Age
42
Years Skiing
40
Fun
2027 DPS Pisteworks 89 Skis
Size Tested:
184 CM
Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes
Boiler plate, Perry Merril.
Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?
I’m not sure if the felt too small or too long.
Scores
Floatation:7/10
 
Stability:7/10
 
Quickness:8/10
 
Playfulness:7/10
 
Forgiveness:7/10
 
Edge Grip:4/10
 
Versatility:4/10
 
Overall:3/10
 
What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?
This ski felt way too soft right away for me.
For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?
I think this ski is good for lighter, less aggressive, skiers.
What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?
This ski is probably great for any type of skier looking for a skinny all mountain ski.
Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?
I think I might have liked these a lot better if it wasn’t for the ice. I felt like I was maybe too big of a human to be on such light weight chattering skis.

Explore More

LEAVE A REPLY
Loading Form...