LABOR DAY SALE - ENDS TODAY!

All orders $50 and over get Free Ground Shipping!

2027 Fischer Ranger 102

ski test sidebar

The 2027 Fischer Ranger 102 carries forward for this year, bringing the same shape, construction, and profile with it. While the 102 is getting a bit wide for pure all-mountain use, this one settles nicely to the softer snow zones around the mountain. Due to the weight, skill, and strength needed to make this ski turn, it’s better suited to advanced and expert skiers who are looking to spend most of their time either in, or in search of, soft and deep snow. Versatility is the standout characteristic here, as the 102 is totally happy both on and off-trail. For many skiers over the years, this has been a great option for mixing softer snow playfulness with fun on-trail performance.

Length155 · 162 · 169 · 176 · 183cm
Side cut
138/103/128 mm
at 183 cm length
Turn radius
19 m
at 183 cm length
Recommended terrain
All-Mountain, Freeride, Powder
Ability level
Advanced, Expert
Rocker profile
Rocker/Camber/Rocker
Construction
Poplar/Beech Wood Core, Titanal, Sintered Base

The Ranger 102 construction should be well known by now. Built with a mix of poplar and beech in the wood core, the ski gets a nice combination of light weight, high energy, and sturdiness. The poplar tends to be a bit lighter and more poppy while the beech adds to the density and dampness of the ski. They don’t stop there with damping, though, thanks to the implementation of their Shaped Ti 0.5mm titanal laminate. In the 102, the metal is mostly full width underfoot, and it tapers in the central portion while remaining longer in the arms over the edges. This gives the ski a damp feeling underfoot with some confident grip while the forebody, shovel, and tails all remain more flexible and floatier for softer snow. In the middle of the ski, Fischer’s Flex-Cut notches in from the sides to create a V-shape that increases the consistency and roundness of the flex. In the 183, the ski weighs 2050 grams, putting it in the slightly heavy category, but the lightness of the swing weight balances it quite effectively. Tester Megan Papineau notes that “So once I realized you really have to engage the front of the boot the ski gets up on edge aggressively but is still so playful and bouncy!” That makes sense as it does take a minute to figure out these skis and how they like to be driven.

The Rocker / Camber / Rocker profile of the 2027 Fischer Ranger 102

If you’re looking to mix on and off-trail attributes, a ski with partial metal in the ~100mm range is a good place to be. In addition, blending the build with the shape is one of Fischer’s best characteristics. The fact that the metal does not extend to the tips and tails allows the ski to feel a bit lighter, so it’s tough to talk about shape without bringing the build back into the conversation. Regardless, the ski has a spoonier and more spatual-oriented shape in the shovel and more of a traditional look in the tail. The 103 mm waist in the 183 uses a 138 mm tip and a 128 mm tail to create a 19-meter turn radius. For a ski this wide, that makes a lot of sense and allows the skier to have more input as to the shape and duration of the turn. The idea is to spend more time in softer snow, so this aligns well with that footprint. There’s dramatic splay in the tips and tails that make it float well for the width, and the tail almost has that twin tip quality that affords creative skiing bordering on freestyle intent. These shaping intricacies lead the Ranger 102 to be one of the more well-rounded and far-reaching skis out there in terms of overall soft snow application, and we’re all about it. Tester Eli Moskowitz states that “The Ranger is an easy ski to hop on and feel at home. I think it was a good all-around ski, it did not have any standout features I but it was just a good all-around ski.” Ranger skis of all widths do generally get that feedback—nothing really stands out, but everything works well.

Loved the color! Overall a fun ski!
Ann MacDonald

It’ll be interesting to see where Fischer goes from here as this ski’s had a decent run. While it’s somewhat easy to turn in softer snow, the weight and the intent put this ski more squarely into the advanced and expert realm. More accurately, those skiers will be able to find the peak of this ski’s performance spectrum easier than a progressing intermediate looking for a wider all-mountain/freeride ski. We’ve found that it’s great in soft snow and open areas, allowing for fun-loving and playful skiing no matter what. If you’re looking for a freeride-based ski that can also handle resort front side fun, this is a great place to be.

Tester Reviews
21 testers reviewed the 2027 Fischer Ranger 102
tester:
Ability
Expert
Height
5'7"
Weight
140
Days / Year
35-40
Age
26
Years Skiing
20+
Moderately aggressive female skier from an on-again-off-again racing background, enjoys trying to make pretty turns no matter what conditions or terrain the ice coast throws at her, isn't always successful.
2027 Fischer Ranger 102 Skis
Size Tested:
169 CM
Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes
Stowe, Nosedive x 2, hardpack.
Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?
Just right!
Scores
Floatation:8/10
 
Stability:7/10
 
Quickness:7/10
 
Playfulness:6/10
 
Forgiveness:7/10
 
Edge Grip:7/10
 
Versatility:7/10
 
Overall:7/10
 
What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?
For how wide these are, they performed pretty well on an icy Nosedive. They took a few turns to be able to properly get up on edge but held pretty well once up there and were very good during the transition. They could definitely go fast! Also very easy to drive.
For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?
Bummed that I only got to try on a groomer, which they were adequate on except for the first few S turns where they were slidey (as expected). I think they’re probably fun in moguls and trees as they weren’t super stiff or demanding, could see them softening.
What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?
Pretty approachable and accessible, quite versatile for a powder ski, something many ability levels could work with and continue to enjoy as they progress.
Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?
Loved them!

Explore More

LEAVE A REPLY
Loading Form...